Legal Opinion
Charles Degnan v. Kathleen Sebelius
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2014No. 13-3055PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Charles Degnan, Kenneth MeCardle, Virginia Belford, and Dale Erlandson appeal the district court’s 2 dismissal of their amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and mandamus jurisdiction based on their failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
Degnan, along with the other named plaintiffs, filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary” and “DHHS”) and the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- L.N.P. v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Henry AsomaniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Bethune v. St. Paul Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- First United Methodist Church v. BecerraDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
- Fortner v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.