Legal Opinion

Twyman v. Twyman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1993No. D-0184Published

1Opinion of the Court

855 S.W.2d 619 (1993)

William E. TWYMAN, Petitioner,

v.

Sheila Kay TWYMAN, Respondent.

No. D-0184.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 5, 1993.

Douglas M. Becker and Roger Moore, Austin, for petitioner.

Edwin J. (Ted) Terry and James LaRue, Austin, for respondent.

OPINION

CORNYN, Justice.

In this case we decide whether a claim for infliction of emotional distress can be brought in a divorce proceeding. Because the judgment of the court of appeals is based on negligent infliction of emotional distress, and cannot be affirmed on that or any other basis, we reverse the judgment of that court and remand this cause…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Phillips; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hecht; Dissent.

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API