Legal Opinion

In Re: Cree, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 21, 2016No. 2015-1365PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an- appeal from a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an ex parte reexamination proceeding. The Board held various claims of a patent owned by Cree, Inc., to be unpatentable as obvious. We affirm.

I

The patent in suit, Cree’s U.S. Patent No. 6,600,175 (“the 175 patent”), filed in 1996, is entitled “Solid State White Light Emitter and Display Using Same.” The claims at issue in this appeal are directed to the production of white light through the “down-conversion” of blue light from light-emitting diodes (“LEDs”). Down-conversion is the process in which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Iron Grip Barbell Company, Inc., and York Barbell Company, Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re Scott T. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. In Re Ben HuangCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. v. Strava, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. Thales Visionix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Monsanto Technology LLC v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. In Re: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API