Legal Opinion

United States v. Ledesma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 17, 2013No. 18-1208UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Luis Cisneros Ledesma appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for sentence modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), wherein he sought a reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 591 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”). Exercising our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and construing Mr. Ledesma’s pro se filings liberally, see Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1201 n. 2 (10th Cir.2010), we deny his request for in forma pauperis (“IFF’) status and affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Ledesma v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API