United States v. Ledesma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Luis Cisneros Ledesma appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for sentence modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), wherein he sought a reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 591 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”). Exercising our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and construing Mr. Ledesma’s pro se filings liberally, see Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1201 n. 2 (10th Cir.2010), we deny his request for in forma pauperis (“IFF’) status and affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
In…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Ledesma v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014