Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation and Hisense Electronica Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PHENIX LONGHORN, LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-477-RWS-RSP § AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and § HISENSE ELECTRONICA MEXICO, § S.A. de C.V., et al., § § Defendants. § ORDER The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before the Court is Plaintiff Phenix Longhorn, LLC’s (1) Objections to the Report and Recommendation Granting-in-Part the Hisense ’788 MSJ (Docket No. 253) and Granting-in-Part the AUO…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Commil United States, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.