Legal Opinion
Bond v. Pulsar Video Productions
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1996No. C021443PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, J.
Plaintiff Michael L. Bond filed suit against his former employer defendant Pulsar Video Productions (Pulsar) alleging numerous causes of action, including racial discrimination. A jury found in favor of Pulsar on the discrimination claim, and Pulsar sought attorney fees. The court awarded Pulsar $22,500 in attorney fees. Bond appeals arguing the court erred in awarding Pulsar attorney fees, applied the wrong legal standard and failed to make the required findings in support of the award. We shall affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Bond brought suit against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cummings v. Benco Building ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stephens v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Jonathan Vo v. Las Virgenes Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Rosenman v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Villanueva v. City of ColtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.