Rosenman v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, Acting P. J .
This is an employment discrimination case under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we hold the trial court did not commit prejudicial error in admitting certain documents used by respondents to impeach appellant’s testimony. Accordingly, we affirm the verdict in favor of respondents. However, in the published portion of the opinion, we reverse the award of attorney fees to respondents, because the trial court failed to find appellant’s case was frivolous, unreasonable, or totally without foundation, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Odessa CARRION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YESHIVA UNIVERSITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Jonathan Vo v. Las Virgenes Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Leek v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.