Legal Opinion
Grimes v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 16, 1998No. AC 14698PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
This matter is currently before us on remand from our Supreme Court. Grimes v. Conservation Commission, 243 Conn. 266, 703 A.2d 101 (1997). The plaintiff, Karen Grimes, appealed to this court from a judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the decision of the conservation commission of the town of Litchfield1 acting pursuant to the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act. General Statutes § 22a-36 et seq. A divided panel of this court reversed the judgment of the trial court, concluding that the plaintiff was given insufficient notice of a site visit that was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Manor Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Dana-Robin Corp. v. Common Council of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grimes v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Maiolo Real Est. Inv. v. Town of Somers, No. Cv 97 64143 S (May 18, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999