Legal Opinion
Salzer v. City of East Lansing
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1933No. Docket No. 101, Calendar No. 37,156PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Counsel are in accord that the city of East Lansing is governed by the statutes applying to cities of the fourth class. The city collects its city taxes in July and general taxes in December, as provided by 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2136. Its fiscal year begins on the first Monday in October of each year.
Representatives of the city became interested in and negotiated for the purchase of certain land adjoining its city hall and belonging to William H. Remez and wife, who were purchasing it on executory contract from Thomas Gunson and wife. On November 11, 1929, the council referred the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dekam v. City of StreatorIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- May v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Tennant v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Stripe v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- Moore v. City of Central CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parker v. Township of West BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Utica State Savings Bank v. Village of Oak ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Pontiac v. DucharmeMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- A. J. Smith Construction Co. v. City of Marine CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- McVeigh v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953