Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Bank of New Brockton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 4 Div. 952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The Bank of New Brockton, a domestic corporation, filed the bill in this cause to foreclose its lien, under section 3476 of the Code, on shares of its stockholders S. M. and C. J. Rowe. The averment is that C. J. Rowe, the owner of 2 shares, is indebted to the bank in a large sum, and S. M. Rowe, the owner of 10 shares, is surety for the obligation of C. J. Rowe. Bankruptcy proceedings were pending against the principal debtor, and the trustee of his estate is made party defendant. By amendment E. B. Peebles and Mercer Rowé are brought in as parties defendant upon an averment, in substance,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Allen v. Montgomery Rail RoadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Truss v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. B. C. Bynum Mercantile Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Burke v. Josiah Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mobile Towing & Wrecking Co. v. HartwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Crawford v. Twin City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Apex Coal Corp. v. Alabama Surface Mining CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API