Legal Opinion

Lippel v. San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1990No. S013741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

In this action we are asked to decide whether it is a denial of due process, as embodied in Code of Civil Procedure section 580 (section 580), to enter a default judgment ordering a husband to pay child support, where the wife’s petition for marital dissolution, which was served on the husband, did not request child support and no notice of any such request was ever served on the husband. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that such a default judgment is void for lack of notice and therefore subject to collateral attack by the husband.

I

Facts and Proceedings Below

In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LippelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Heidary v. YadollahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. In Re Marriage of ComerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cassel v. Sullivan, Roche & JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API