Legal Opinion

United States Jaycees v. Richardet

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1983No. 5889, 5890PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Lillian Richardet, as representative of a female class, filed suit challenging the membership policies of the Jaycees organization. Richardet contended that the organization’s by-laws excluding women from full membership violated article 1, sections 1 and 3 of the Alaska Constitution 1 and the Alaska Public Accomodations Statute, AS 18.80.230. 2 The superior court rejected Ri-chardet’s constitutional claims, but ruled that the Jaycees’ membership practices did violate the public accommodations statute and ordered the organization to admit women as full members.

On…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Welsh v. Boy Scouts of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States Jaycees v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Dale v. Boy Scouts of America & Monmouth CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API