Legal Opinion

Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. Hight

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1898No. 8108PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Robinson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

The defendant in error instituted this action against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated the company, to recover an amount alleged to be his damages from injuries sustained while in the employ of the company, by reason of its negligence. A verdict in favor of the defendant in error was returned in the district court, and judgment rendered thereon, and the company has removed the cause to this court for review of the proceedings in the trial court.

At the commencement of the trial there was interposed for the company an objection to the introduction of any evidence. The ground of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hill v. GustIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Ingerman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Anderson v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Vohs v. A. E. Shorthill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Brackman Ex Rel. Schaub v. BrackmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API