Legal Opinion
Town of Secaucus v. Damsil, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 21, 1972PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 N.J. Super. 470 (1972)
295 A.2d 8
TOWN OF SECAUCUS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,
v.
DAMSIL, INC., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 18, 1972.
Reargued September 12, 1972.
Decided September 21, 1972.
Before Judges LABRECQUE, KOLOVSKY and MATTHEWS.
Mr. Leo Rosenblum argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Joseph Gordon argued the cause for respondent Damsil, Inc. (Messrs. Gordon and Kanengiser, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph M. Clayton, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, appeared for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Stack v. HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- In Re Appeal of Neptune Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- State v. Mayor & Common Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1856
- Blauvelt v. FullerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Bernards TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Borough of Fort Lee v. Hudson Terrace ApartmentsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Lawrence Associates v. Lawrence TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Berkley Arms Apartment Corp. v. Hackensack CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Tower West Apartment Ass'n v. Town of West New YorkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.