Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garcia
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
GREENE, J.,
in which BELL, C.J., and MURPHY, J., join.
1 agree with the majority’s conclusion that Respondent violated Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 8.4; however, I disagree that disbarment is the appropriate sanction. I would impose an indefinite suspension, with Respondent’s reinstatement to the Maryland Bar conditioned upon his reinstatement to the New York Bar. In this case, I would either defer to the New York Supreme Court, treat the case as a reciprocal discipline case, and impose the same sanction, or I would apply the rationale of Attorney Grievance…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- United States v. Axel UrbanikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.