Continental Casualty Co. v. Signal Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Judge.
In this action two liability insurance carriers seek to recover contribution from a third liability insurance carrier on the ground that they all insured the same risk. The case was tried to the court without a jury on stipulated facts and specified exhibits. The court initially ordered judgment for the appellant Continental Casualty Company, but after additional memoranda and arguments, reversed its order and rendered judgment in favor of the appellees, Signal Insurance Company and National Indemnity Company. This appeal followed.
The stipulated facts, which are adopted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American States Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Lawrence v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- James Weller, Inc. v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Pines of La Jolla Homeowners Ass'n v. Industrial IndemnityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- GRANITE STATE INS. v. Employers Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- State v. Oriental Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.