Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 9, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2662PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Presiding Judge.
The issue in this case involves a determination of the respective rights and obligations of two insurance companies who each have pro rata coverage on the same fire loss. To properly decide this case we must determine if an insured has any assignable rights in an insurance policy where there is a dispute between two insurance companies as to their respective obligations under the terms of the policies.
In 1971, Frank and Doris Bonham (contract sellers) sold their home to Royal and Lois Burrough (contract buyers). In March, 1972, the property suffered a fire loss in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1971
- Kalkbrenner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Smith v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Conrad Bros. v. John Deere Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Wehr Constructors, Inc. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.