Legal Opinion

Gibson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1979No. WCB 76-4935, CA 10767, SC 25976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

This is a claim for compensation under ORS chapter 656. No one involved seems sure whether the claim is for injury or for occupational disease. Claimant contends it is "a compensable industrial claim.” The insurer, State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) asserts that "the incident for which claimant filed this claim is not compensable” but does refer to "claimant’s alleged injury.” The referee states simply that he is dealing with "a denied claim.” The Workers’ Compensation Board speaks of a "denial of claimant’s claim for compensability of paroxysmal fibrillation.” The Court of Appeals refers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gibson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Autwell v. Tri-MetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Duffy v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Morgan v. Beaver Heat Treating Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Halberg v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API