Valador, Inc. v. HTC Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge
At issue in this trademark infringement case is whether plaintiffs expert on the question of likelihood of confusion should be excluded pursuant to Rule 702, Fed. R. Evid., and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). As the matter has been fully briefed, and because oral argument would not aid the decisional process,1 this question is now ripe for resolution.
I
This action arises from defendants’ alleged trademark infringement on plaintiffs registered mark, “VIVE,” which plaintiff…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Ever-Ready Incorporated, a Corporation, and Mark Gilbert, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Combe Inc. v. Dr. Aug. Wolff GMBH & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- DC Comics v. Cellular Nerd LLC. dba Cellular Nerd, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2022
- Illinois Tamale Co. v. El-Greg, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Inkit, Inc. v. airSlate, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.