Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Dickinson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 4, 2013No. AC 35012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The defendant, Stephen J. Dickinson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for contempt filed by the plaintiff, Stephanie H. Dickinson. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly found him in contempt because (1) he, after having filed a pro se appearance, had not been notified of the pending motions for contempt or the ready markings and (2) there was no evidence that he was in contempt of the court’s orders. We agree with the second claim and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.1

The following facts are relevant to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Bryant v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Kelly v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Edmond v. FoiseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mekrut v. SuitsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  2. Brody v. BrodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API