Legal Opinion

United States v. Winner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1981No. 80-2154PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

This is an original proceeding in the nature of mandamus. Petitioner, United States of America, seeks an order compelling Respondent District Court to vacate orders commanding the presence of Deputy Attorney General Charles B. Renfrew and Assistant Attorney General Philip B. Heymann at post-conviction proceedings in a pending criminal case.

Real Party in Interest James Feeney was convicted by a jury of defrauding federally insured financial institutions through the use of false banking instruments.1 These instruments originated from several British West Indies banks…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Larry Leon Chaney v. John N. Brown, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re Grand Jury Matters, Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Lynn E. Boughton v. Cotter Corporation Commonwealth Edison Company, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API