Legal Opinion
Hawaiian Electric Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1984No. 83-7259PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. (HECO) seeks review of an EPA determination not to proceed with consideration of modifying PSD permit HI 78-02 until HECO complies with the procedure for permit revision applying to major modifications. HECO’s appeal is timely under 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b) (Clean Air Act). We affirm EPA’s determination and hold that all other issues raised are not ripe for review.
HECO’s Kahe power plant is Oahu’s greatest source of sulfur dioxide emissions. In 1978 it consisted of five oil-fired units, all built before 1975, with a total capacity of about 500…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Neil Monet v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sudomir v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Masoud Mahini v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.