Legal Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Foster
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 1:CV-90-390Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
We are currently considering the motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiffs, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and Nationwide General Insurance Company (hereinafter collectively referred to in the singular as “Nationwide”).
The complaint was filed on February 26, 1990, challenging certain provisions of Pennsylvania’s new automobile insurance law, Act 6 of 1990, enacted on February 7, 1990. Defendant, Constance B. Foster, Pennsylvania’s Insurance Commissioner, filed a motion to dismiss on March 15th.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ecri, a Nonprofit Pennsylvania Corporation v. McGraw Inc., McGraw Information Systems Co., and McGraw Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.