Pierce v. Pierce
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Marquette. (Stone, J.) Bill for an accounting. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Defendant appeals from the decree of the court below upon an accounting ordered by this Court in Pierce v. Pierce, 55 Mich. 629.
Complainants and defendant were joint owners of the property known as the “ Cheshire Mine.” Defendant went into possession of the Cheshire mine, and the property connected therewith, under an agreement with complainants that the property should be operated in their joint behalf. The ore deposit upon the property became exhausted in 1881. Prior to this time defendant had obtained a lease of adjoining property, known as the “ Swanzey Mine,” and was operating the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Everts v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Major v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Pierce v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Evans v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Alford v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Henderson v. Connolly's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Mousseau v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.