Bergman v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ENSLEN, District Judge.
ON MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
After rendering an Opinion from the Bench on March 3, 1983 on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Production of Documents, the Court, so as to more fully set forth the basis of that decision, issues the following written Opinion. Based upon an asserted privilege which protects the government from disclosing the identity of its confidential informers, Defendants objected to certain of Plaintiffs’ requests for production of documents. After attempted conciliation between the parties with regard to the informer’s privilege failed, the Court was…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anthony C. Diminnie v. United States of America and Daniel PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Anderson v. CornejoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Guccione v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Bergman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Keith L. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.