Legal Opinion
Garofolo, Curtiss, Lambert & MacLean, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1994No. 255 M.D. 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*675RODGERS,1 Senior Judge.
In July 1992, Garofolo, Curtiss, Lambert & MacLean (Garofolo), a Pennsylvania corporation and a management consulting firm specializing in executive search services, filed a petition for review in our original jurisdiction, against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, asking this Court to declare Section 16 of Act 222, suspending operation of net loss carryover deductions from the taxable income of corporations unconstitutional, as violative of the due process (Article I, Section 1) and uniformity (Article VIII, Section 1) provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Prior…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- AMIDON v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Amidon v. KaneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sher v. Berks County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- TriState HVAC Equipment, LLP v. Big Belly Solar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Dana Corporation v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.