TriState HVAC Equipment, LLP v. Big Belly Solar, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOHN, District Judge.
Following my grant to TriState HVAC Equipment, LLP (“TriState”) of leave to amend its complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), and TriState’s filing of its amended complaint, Big Belly Solar, Inc. (“Big Belly”) has filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss all but one of the seven counts in TriState’s amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, I will grant in part and deny in part Big Belly’s motion.
1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case arises from a distribution agreement between TriState, a Pennsylvania limited…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Neopart Transit, LLC v. CBM N.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Gladstone Technology, Partners, LLC v. DahlDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Incarcerated Entm't, LLC v. CNBC LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- DIXON v. LINCOLN UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.