Legal Opinion
United States v. Wyche
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 2, 2004No. CR-03-408PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendant Charles Wyche moves pursuant to Rules 12 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution, to suppress the physical evidence offered against him, his identification by a witness at the scene of the alleged crime, and also the written statement elicited from him by the police subsequent to his arrest. For the following reasons, Wyche’s motions are DENIED.
Background
A. Factual background
Nassau County police officers arrested Wyche in the early morning hours of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. EchevarriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Scott v. FisherDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. ChandlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. CarrDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.