Legal Opinion

Lutton v. Rau

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1918No. Civ. No. 2156PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

In this action judgment of nonsuit was entered against the plaintiff, who has appealed. The suit was .brought for the purpose of enforcing a demand for rent alleged to be held against the respondent Rau as assignee of the codefendants named herein of a lease to certain storerooms located in the city of Los Angeles. The lease was made by the assignor of plaintiff with defendants Roggy & Runge, a copartnership. It was alleged that this lease was afterward assigned to respondent, who entered upon and occupied the premises and who later attempted to assign his rights to other persons. It was to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Salisbury v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fletcher v. M'FarlaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Jordan v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Kelly v. Tri-Cities Broadcasting, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Pickler v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Leeker v. MarcotteArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API