Legal Opinion
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided November 21, 2000No. 07-99-0428-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN T. BOYD, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises from a dispute between parties to two oil and gas leases in which the lessors claim that the leases have terminated due to a cessation in production. In the appeal, appellants Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL), MidCon Gas Services Corp. (Mid-Con), and Chesapeake Panhandle Limited Partnership (Chesapeake) challenge a judgment in favor of appellees 1 declaring that the subject oil and gas leases terminated pursuant to the terms of the haben-dum clause of the leases, and awarding damages plus attorney’s fees and sanctions.
In eight…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Mancorp, Inc. v. CULPEPPEERTexas Supreme Court · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Krabbe v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Ridenour v. Herrington, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Krabbe, Harry Kenneth, Donald Dean Krabbe, Mrs. Montye G. Keeter, and Betty J. Rockwell, Trustee of the Betty J. Rockwell Trust v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.