Krtinich v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Appeal from an order granting judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict for plaintiff. The order was made on defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Action was instituted by Mary Krtinich individually and as special administratrix of the estate of George Krtinich, her deceased husband and father of her children, George (age ten), John (age nine), C. (age seven), and Marlene (age four). Defendant answered, denying that it was negligent and alleging contributory negligence and assumption of risk. Upon issues thus…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Hendrickson v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Woehrle v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Molden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schroht v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Forde v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Zontelli Bros.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Altrichter v. SHELL OIL COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Haase v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.