Legal Opinion

Scully v. Dermody

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.

It appears from the bill of complaint in this suit in chancery that on July 15, 1884, Mary G. Dermody executed what purported to be a quitclaim deed to Hugh Kelly of a certain parcel of real estate in Bennington and on the same day said Hugh Kelly executed what purported to be a quitclaim deed of the same property to Michael Dermody. Michael, who was the husband of Mary, did not join in the execution of her said deed to Kelly and it is alleged that because of his failure so to join said deed was void and no title was conveyed by Mary’s purported deed to Kelly or by Kelly’s purported deed to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Waterman v. MoodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  3. Blondin v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  4. Van Dyke v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. Quinn v. ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
  2. Price v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  3. Olcott v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  4. Century Indemnity Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. LaMantia v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API