Legal Opinion

Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 2009No. A08-0233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

In this dispute involving whether a sign complies with a prior stipulation and judgment (judgment) and relevant city ordinances, appellant-city argues that (1) its failure to enforce the judgment does not prevent it from now doing so; (2) the district court’s findings do not support the conclusion that the sign faces are in substantial compliance with the judgment; and (3) the district court erred in determining that respondent-nursery established a vested right to maintain the sign. Respondents filed a notice of review and argue that the district court erred (1) in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Bondy v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API