Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
In this dispute involving whether a sign complies with a prior stipulation and judgment (judgment) and relevant city ordinances, appellant-city argues that (1) its failure to enforce the judgment does not prevent it from now doing so; (2) the district court’s findings do not support the conclusion that the sign faces are in substantial compliance with the judgment; and (3) the district court erred in determining that respondent-nursery established a vested right to maintain the sign. Respondents filed a notice of review and argue that the district court erred (1) in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Bondy v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010