Legal Opinion
B.A.M. Brokerage Corp. v. State of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 22, 1988No. 88 Civ. 5714 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff B.A.M. Brokerage Corp., Amy Litsky and about 100 other plaintiffs (the “Brokers”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 65 to enjoin defendants the State of New York, James P. Corcoran, the Superintendent of Insurance, and five other named defendants in the Insurance Department of the State of New York (the “Department”) from issuing administrative citations and conducting disciplinary hearings involving the Brokers. The Department has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of abstention. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BAM Brokerage Corp. v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989