Legal Opinion

Comer Blocker v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 25, 1959No. 14274_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Comer Blocker was indicted, tried and convicted for murder in the first degree. His defense was insanity. Three psychiatrists testified at his trial, two called by the defense and one by the prosecutor. All three were on the staff at St. Elizabeths Hospital, an institution owned by the Federal Government and operated by it for the mentally ill. Blocker had undergone observation there for some sixty days or more. The testimony of the doctors called by him was based upon that observation. The testimony of the-other doctor, for the Government, was based upon a three-hour examination at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Russell E. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. In Re RosenfieldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Comer Blocker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. Maurice I. Millard v. David W. Harris, Acting Superintendent, St. Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. Winfred Overholser v. Herbert T. O'BeirneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API