Legal Opinion

Comer Blocker v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 1961No. 15777PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

We reversed appellant’s former conviction of first degree murder. Blocker v. United States, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 63, 274 F.2d 572. He now appeals from another conviction and sentence of death for the same crime. There was substantial evidence that he was, and substantial evidence that he was not, insane at the time of the offense.

In 1895 the Supreme Court ruled that “if the whole evidence, including that supplied by the presumption of sanity, does not exclude beyond reasonable doubt the hypothesis of insanity, of which some proof is adduced, the accused is entitled to an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Russell E. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Charles W. Douglas v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API