Legal Opinion

De Fries v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 6, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01882Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ROLAND J. DE FRIES, No. 3:20-cv-01882 (MPS) Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS Plaintiff Roland J. De Fries, who is proceeding pro se, brought this action against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), alleging common law and statutory claims arising from the alleged loss and destruction of De Fries’s personal property in connection with the foreclosure on his home. ECF No. 2. Wells Fargo moves to dismiss the Complaint for insufficient service of process pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Bennie Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Zapata v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. G4 Concept Marketing, Inc. v. Mastercard InternationalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API