G4 Concept Marketing, Inc. v. Mastercard International
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, a marketing corporation and its officers and/or agents, filed this pro se action on October 6, 2008. On February 24, 2009, defendant MasterCard International (“MasterCard”)moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m), for failure to serve the summons and complaint within the statutory 120-day period (Dkt. # 2).
Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a plaintiff to effect proper service on the defendant within 120 days of filing the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). A court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Grace v. Bank Leumi Trust Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Feingold v. HankinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De Fries v. Wells Fargo Bank, NADistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Moss v. Brentwood Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Rayeski v. DeJoyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024