Harron, Rickard & McCone v. Wilson, Lyon & Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Action to recover from the defendant rent for the use of certain personal property according to *491the terms of a lease thereof, amounting to the sum of $956.28. It is alleged in the complaint that on May 11, 1904, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into and executed a lease in writing of certain personal property (setting forth a copy thereof); that upon the execution of said lease the defendant, by virtue of its provisions, took possession of the property therein described, and has ever since retained the possession thereof, and that no part of the money therein agreed to be paid by it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kindred v. Second Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Frohreich v. GammonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pratt v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Johnson v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Watson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Schneider v. DanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Williams v. LowenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.