Legal Opinion

In Re Moross Against Hillsdale County

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWlEST, J.

November 80, 1926, plaintiffs filed with the board of supervisors of Hillsdale county a statement of claim for damages. The board rejected the claim; plaintiffs appealed to the circuit court; the court-sustained a motion in the nature of a demurrer to the statement and ordered dismissal of the cause. The liability of the county is pressed by writ of error.

Briefly, the plaintiffs’ statement of claim alleges:

They are the owners of considerable land in Hills-dale county, on which they have and use valuable water rights in the operation of a flour mill, feed mill, buckwheat mill, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gunther v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. McCaul v. County of KentMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Herro v. Chippewa County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Granite Oil Securities, Inc. v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Plunkett v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API