Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Fenster
District Court, E.D. New York
In Equity. Bill by the Sperry & Hutchinson Company against Murray Eenster and others.
1Opinion of the Court
CPIATEIEED, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction against several defendants, one of whom is in default, one appears in person, and the others are represented by attorney. The latter raises objections which go substantially to the issuance of any injunction upon the bill and petition, so that the matter will be considered in its entirety.
The papers show the usual condition presented in similar suits in which the defendants have obtained S. & H. Green trading stamps, under conditions equivalent to a purchase from the subscribers for these stamps, and are giving them to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. BenjaminU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Consumer Profit Sharing Co. v. Original Green Stamp Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. BerkeleyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.