Legal Opinion

Pellettieri v. Protopapas

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LINTNER, J.A.D.

This appeal arises from cross motions for summary judgment in an action brought by plaintiff law firm, Pellettieri, Rabstein and Altman, against its former client defendant, Michael Protopapas, for collection of fees. Plaintiff represented defendant in two separate matters, a matrimonial proceeding and a bankruptcy. Finding there were material questions of fact that had to be resolved in a plenary hearing, the judge denied plaintiffs motion regarding the fees rendered in defendant’s bankruptcy action. Although the judge entered partial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. In Re Application of LiVolsiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Metromedia Co. v. Hartz Mountain AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garrett v. MatisaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  2. In Re SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. In Re SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. In re: Cytophil, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
  5. SOBEL AND BROWN, PC VS. THOMAS HOXIE (L-4418-18, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API