Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Barry

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 11, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city, of Richmond in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. .Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This action of assumpsit, brought by Thomas A. Barry against the city of Richmond, grew out of the execution of certain work under four written contracts entered into' by the city with Barry, for the construction of certain sewers and other incidental work in connection therewith, tbe plaintiff claiming an indebtedness to him from the city of $7,924.73, on. the following bill of particulars:

*276“For timber furnished in penitentiary system of sewers, as per bill of particulars ............. $2,269.05

Balance due on brick work on penitentiary system of sewers, as per bill of particulars..........…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walls v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Johnson's Adm'r v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. Mills & FairfaxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Rector v. Asa Snyder & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Richlands Flint Glass Co. v. HiltebeitelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. Gateway Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Rosenberg v. TurnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Scott's v. ChestermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. John W. Johnson, Inc. v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
  5. North Shore Improvement Co. v. N. Y. P. & N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API