Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Schreck

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 23, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Under the terms of the escrow agreement, the defendant undertook to procure an order from the Rent Commission increasing the maximum rent for the apartment in question. Implied in this agreement was a covenant on plaintiff’s part that he would deal fairly and act in good faith (Price v. Spielman Motor Sales Co., 261 App. Div. 626, 629; Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Armstrong Co., 263 N. Y. 79, 87). Since plaintiff, as the landlord, was the only person under the statute and regulations who could apply for such an order, and had refused to execute the necessary form, his conduct frustrated and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Price v. Spielman Motor Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Ziegler v. Mancuso & Alessio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rochester Park, Inc. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API