Metrotop Plaza Associates v. United States

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant maintains that plaintiffs claims challenging the decisions of the contracting officer were filed outside the limitations periods identified in the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2000), and therefore may not be heard by this court. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Metrotop Plaza Associates, entered into a rental agreement with the General Services Administration…