Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Union Bag & Paper Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1894No. 5521PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

May .1, 1890, H. Rebfeld and Julius Rosenberg were in business, in the city of Omaha as partners under the firm name and style of “Omaha Chemical Works,” and being indebted to the parties, business firms and banks, plaintiffs in error herein and others, including the defendant in error, executed and delivered to Moritz Meyer, of the firm of Max Meyer & Co., the following conveyance or bill of sale:

“ For and in consideration of the sum of five thousand six' huiidreil and nineteen and (5,619.60) dollars to us in hand paid, and the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, we do hereby bargain,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. KinkaidNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McDonald v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bonns v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Jenkins v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Jones v. LoreeNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co. v. BremersNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. ChapmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Dempster Mill Manufacturing Co. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bacon v. P. Brockman Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Smith v. BowenNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API