Legal Opinion

Franklin Building Supply Co. v. Sumpter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2004No. 29822PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Franklin Building Supply filed a material-man’s hen on the home of Douglas and Pamela Sumpter after their contractor, Pond Construction, defaulted on its account with Franklin and filed for bankruptcy. The appeal challenges the district court’s order holding that the hen was not timely filed and dismissing Franklin’s foreclosure proceedings, and the district court’s use of the statutory rate of interest to be applied on the hen claim. Because the hen was filed within ninety days of the date that the last item was supplied by the materialman, we reverse the district court’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Barber v. HonorofIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stonebrook Constraction, LLC v. Chase Home Finance, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Read v. HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Credit Suisse AG v. Teufel Nursery, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hap Taylor & Sons, Inc. v. Summerwind Partners, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API