Legal Opinion
Cox v. Livingston
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1967No. 65 Civ. 2089PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN M. CANNELLA, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion for an order sustaining their objections to certain interrogatories propounded of them by the plaintiffs, is granted.
This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on or about December 29, 1963. In connection therewith, the plaintiffs have propounded thirty-six interrogatories to the defendants, two1 of which the defendants have objected to as being irrelevant, incompetent and immaterial and thus outside the scope of Rules 26 (b) and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
With respect to interrogatory…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Rolfe v. . HewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Orgel v. McCurdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Cook v. WeltyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Novak v. Good Will Grange No. 127District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fort v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Wood v. McCulloughDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Pruitt v. The M/V PatigniesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967