Legal Opinion

Wood v. McCullough

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 8, 1968No. 67 Civ. 3830PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

POLLACK, District Judge.

Three defendant physicians in this malpractice action object to identical written interrogatories which plaintiff has addressed to each of them respectively under Rule 33, F.R.Civ.P. The interrogatories, numbered 7, 8 and 9, seek the particulars of any other legal action in which any of the three physicians was involved as a party.

Other legal proceedings instituted by or against these physician defendants are not relevant to the potential issues for trial in this case. In the exercise of the Court’s discretion, the objections to Interrogatories 7, 8 and 9…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. LivingstonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marker v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
  2. Miller v. Doctor's General HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  3. McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Fuller v. Jackson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API