Legal Opinion
Horan v. King County, Washington, Division of Emergency Medical Services
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 20, 1990No. C89-248ZPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHER RULINGS
ZILLY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Having considered all materials filed in support of and in opposition to these motions, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment (docket no. 30). The Court also GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket no. 36), and GRANTS the parties sixty (60) days to explore a possible settlement regarding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Quirk v. Baltimore County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Burgess v. Catawba CountyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1992
- James M. Alex v. City of Chicago, Michael M. McKittrick v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Kurt W. Bond, Cross-Appellants v. City of Jackson, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Spires v. Ben Hill CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.